medical research presentation and paper

Assignment Objectives:

to become familiar with scholarship in a particular area of bioethics.

to demonstrate an ability to summarize another thinker’s argument or point of view.

to demonstrate an ability to communicate effectively.

  • Assignment Description: 
  • The oral report is an article review.  Students choose a current scholarly article written on a topic in bioethics to summarize and analyze.  They present their summary and analysis in a 2-3 page essay and as an oral report via power point, Prezi, or some other presentation tool. Students use Stritch library data bases or bioethics anthologies of articles on reserve for this class to choose and then summarize a scholarly, academic articlethat entertains a topic in bioethics.  Students then present their summary of the chosen article to the class along with an analysis of the article. A power point or prezi or handout is required.  The report should include:
  • The article title and bibliographical information – author, where and when it was published. (A copy or link to the article should be submitted on Canvas.)

A brief statement of the author’s credentials/affiliation, if accessible.

A correct and detailed summary of the article’s argument, position, content.

An analysis which may include: a consideration of the truth or falsity of one or more statements made in the article; a consideration of weak or strong portions of the article; if an analogy is introduced, a consideration of whether the analogy ‘works’; an identification of any logical fallacies (Links to an external site.) that may be present; a statement about which theoretical perspective (if discernible) informs the author’s view.

Grading will be based upon the quality of both written and oral presentations of the material. 

Rubric

Oral Report Rubric (1) (1) (1) (1)

Oral Report Rubric (1) (1) (1) (1)

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: Depth and Accuracy

45.0 pts

The article was summarized in detail and with care. There were no inaccurate statements.

35.0 pts

  • The article was summarized adequately. There were no inaccurate statements.
  • 30.0 pts
  • The article was summarized in a basic way. There were some inaccurate statements.
  • 20.0 pts

The article was summarized poorly. There were many inaccurate statements. It was incomplete.

45.0 ptsFILLER TEXT

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

15.0 pts

The analysis was advanced, thoughtful, careful. Student demonstrates advanced analytical ability.

10.0 pts

The analysis was basic. It showed effort and attention.

5.0 pts

The analysis was poor – disorganized, careless, or very brief.

0.0 pts

There was no analysis or the analysis was incomprehensible.

15.0 ptsFILLER TEXT

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Communication Aids

15.0 pts

The visual presentation was helpful to the audience and either very attractive or very creative. There were no grammatical errors.

10.0 pts

The visual presentation was helpful to the audience in understanding the article and the issues at stake. There were a minimal number of grammatical errors.

5.0 pts

Visual presentation was very short, lacking creativity or carelessly written

0.0 pts

Visual aids were non-existent. OR Writing was difficult to read because there were so many mistakes.

15.0 ptsFILLER TEXT

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOral Performance

10.0 pts

The student seemed very comfortable with the material and did little reading – and supplemented reading with explanations that are not read.

7.0 pts

The student sometimes floundered, but attempted to speak independently from notes.

3.0 pts

The student read most of his/her presentation.

0.0 pts

The student read the entire presentation.

10.0 ptsFILLER TEXT

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDocumentation

15.0 pts

Citation style is followed carefully. Student cites the source article within the text of the summary essay, on the “References” page and within the powerpoint.

10.0 pts

Minor citation mistakes are noted. Citation may be missing from the text of the summary essay or in the powerpoint.

5.0 pts

Citation is somewhat haphazard or careless, but is present in one part of the project.

0.0 pts

No Marks

Student payed little attention to citation style and guidelines or student does not indicate authorship at all.

15.0 ptsFILLER TEXT

Total Points: 100.0

 
"Order a similar paper and get 100% plagiarism free, professional written paper now!"

assess the probable difficulties of the it executives at st luke s view wireless networking as ke

Write a fully developed paper in which you:

  1. Assess the probable difficulties of the IT executives at St. Luke’s view wireless networking as key lever in their quest to increase clinician productivity and improved patient care.
  2. Analyze how the Mobility XE enables the IT department to centrally manage all wireless devices used by clinicians.
  3. Critique the Mobility works solution and recommend one change to the solution to provide better productivity and improved patient care.
  4. Use at least three quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as quality resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Analyze the technologies and architectures that have been developed for networking over shorter distances.
 
"Order a similar paper and get 100% plagiarism free, professional written paper now!"

recommendations for how the patriots can improve in the future

2 pages, give recommendations for how the Patriots can improve in the future based on team.

  1. Optimize their defense off a running offense
  2. https://www.bostonherald.com/2019/10/16/five-ways-the-perfect-patriots-can-get-better/

You can find some resources from websites. But I only need recommendations to Patriots. Do not introduce their team, or their game date…

I post a ppt from my class, in ppt it gives some team building knowledge, please use some knowledge in this ppt to write this recommendation essay.

 
"Order a similar paper and get 100% plagiarism free, professional written paper now!"