Create a one-paragraph hypothetical scenario that illustrates one of the following types of dilemmas or challenges. A moral dilemma

Week 7 Assignment: Decision-Making Analysis Paper

Rubric

PSYC_160_OL – Paper Rubric
PSYC_160_OL – Paper Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Content

25 to >22.25 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations
The writer clearly and effectively responds to the assignment with details and specific examples. Content fully addresses all aspects of the assignment. Main ideas are clear and are well supported by detailed and accurate information. All content is accurate. All opinions are thoroughly supported.

22.25 to >18.75 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations
The response to the assignment is generally adequate, but may not be thorough. May be lacking some details and explanations. Main ideas are clear but are not well supported by detailed information. Content addresses, or partially addresses, most aspects of the assignment. Most content is accurate. Most opinions are supported in some way.

18.75 to >14.75 pts

Below Expectations
The response to the assignment is vague and/ or inaccurate. May be lacking several details and explanations. Main ideas are not always clear or supported. Content addresses few aspects of the assignment. Much of the content is inaccurate in some way. Few opinions are supported.

14.75 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations
The writer does not respond to the assignment or the response is far outside the parameters of the assignment. The topic and main ideas are not clear. Most content is inaccurate.
25 pts
Organization

15 to >13.35 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Information is relevant and presented in a logical order. Writing and integration of source materials is eloquent and skillful. Connections among topics are clear without being repetitive or redundant.

13.35 to >11.25 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations
Writing and integration of source materials is adequate with lapses in structure. Most connections among topics are clear without being repetitive or redundant.

11.25 to >8.85 pts

Below Expectations
Writing and integration of source materials is awkward or confusing. Few connections among topics are clear. There is some repetitiveness or redundancy.

8.85 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations
There is no clear , structure. Writing lacks skill. Sources are not present. Connections among topics are not evident.
15 pts
Mechanics and APA

10 to >8.9 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations
The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly. The paper meets all assignment criteria in length, structure, and source criteria.

8.9 to >7.5 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations
The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly. The paper meets most of the assignment criteria in length, structure, and source criteria.

7.5 to >5.9 pts

Below Expectations
The assignment occasionally follows current or outdated APA format with multiple mistakes and/or grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Few sources are cited and referenced correctly. The paper meets some of the assignment criteria in length, structure, and source criteria.

5.9 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations
The assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing. The paper meets few of the assignment criteria in length, structure, and source criteria.
10 pts
Total Points: 50
 
"Order a similar paper and get 100% plagiarism free, professional written paper now!"